ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE@#To investigate the biological effects and its relative mechanism of decitabine combined with anlotinib on multiple myeloma cells.@*METHODS@#The human MM cell lines and primary cells were treated with different concentrations of decitabine, anlotinib, and decitabine+anlotinib, respectively. The cell viability was detected and combination effect was calculated by CCK-8 assay. The apoptosis rate was measured by flow cytometry and the level of c-Myc protein was determined by Western blot.@*RESULTS@#Both decitabine and anlotinib could effectively inhibit the proliferation and induce the apoptosis of MM cell lines NCI-H929 and RPMI-8226. The effect of combined treatment on the inhibition of cell proliferation and induction of apoptosis was stronger than that of single-drug treatment. The combination of the two drugs also showed strong cytotoxicity in primary MM cells. Decitabine and anlotinib could down-regulate the level of c-Myc protein in MM cells and the c-Myc level in the combination group was the lowest.@*CONCLUSION@#Decitabine combined with anlotinib can effectively inhibit the proliferation and induce apoptosis of MM cells, which provides a certain experimental basis for the treatment of human MM.
Subject(s)
Humans , Multiple Myeloma/metabolism , Decitabine , Cell Line, Tumor , Apoptosis , Cell ProliferationABSTRACT
Objective Decitabine (DAC) combined with the half dose priming regimen (HDPR) is a common treatment of myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) and acute myeloid leukemia (AML) in the elderly. This study was to compare the clinical effect and safety of DAC combined with all-trans retinoic acid (ATRA) versus DAC plus HDPR in the treatment of MDS with excess of blasts (MDS-EB) or AML in elderly patients. Methods We retrospectively analyzed 48 elderly patients (≥60 years) with myeloid neoplasms (AML, MDS-EB-1 or MDS-EB-2) ineligible for standard chemotherapy treated in our hospital from January 2014 to October 2018, 22 by DAC+ATRA (group A) and the other 26 by DAC+HDPR (group B). We compared the overall response rate (ORR), overall survival (OS) and adverse events between the two groups of patients. Results No statistically significant difference was observed between groups A and B in ORR (86.4% vs 76.9%, P = 0.643) or median OS (26.2 vs 24.9 mo, P = 0.920). The median time to response was significantly longer in group A (2 courses) than in B (1 course) (P = 0.006). Compared with group A, group B showed remarkably lower incidence rates of grade-3 to -4 cytopenia (54.5% vs 84.6%, P = 0.029) and infection (45.5% vs 76.9%, P = 0.037), longer duration of neutropenia (P < 0.05), and higher volumes red blood cell infusion and platelet infusion (P < 0.05). There was no statistically significant difference in the incidence rate of bleeding between the two groups (P = 0.643). Conclusion DAC+ATRA and DAC+HDPR have comparable clinical effects on myeloid neoplasms in elderly patients, but the former is safer and better tolerated while the latter can achieve a more rapid response.
ABSTRACT
<p><b>OBJECTIVES</b>To explore the effect of additional chromosomal abnormalities on the prognosis and outcome of CML-CP patients receiving imatinib therapy.</p><p><b>METHODS</b>The clinical and genetic data of 589 CML-CP patients receiving imatinib treatment between May 2009 and October 2014 in the 1st Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University were analyzed, the 589 patients were divided into 5 groups according to the karyotypes at the initial diagnosis. The OS(overall survival), PFS (progression-free survival), EFS (event-free survival), Cumulative MMR (major molecular remission) and Cumulative CCyR (complete cytogenetic remission) were calculated by using the Kaplan-Meier method and compared by using the log-rank text by Graphpad 6.0. The χ test was used to compare the frequency of optimal molecular response at 3, 6, 12 months among the 5 groups.</p><p><b>RESULTS</b>There was significant difference about the frequency of optimal molecular response at 3 and 6 months between CML-CP patients with additional chromosomal abnormalities and those with classic t(9;22) ［50%（12/24） vs. 73.94%(261 /353), P<0.05; 50%(10 /20) vs. 72.05%(232 /322) (P<0.05)］, and the same significant difference was found at 6 months between the group with variant translocations and that with classic t(9;22) ［53.3% (16 /30) vs. 72.05%(232 /322) (P<0.05)］. The P values of cumulative CCyR (P<0.05) and EFS (P<0.01) for 4 years were statistically significant between CML-CP patients with additional chromosomal abnormalities and the other 4 groups. Compared one to another, there was the significant difference in cumulative CCyR and EFS for 4 years between CML-CP patients with additional chromosomal.abnormalities and those with classic t(9;22) (47.25% vs. 84.01%)(P<0.05); (75.03% vs. 90.01%)(P<0.01).</p><p><b>CONCLUSION</b>The additional chromosomal abnormalities influence the outcome of CML-CP patients receiving imatinib treatment, which make poor prognosis.</p>